Fee or free: when should firms charge for online content?

Lambrecht, A and Misra, K (2016) Fee or free: when should firms charge for online content? Management Science, 63 (4). pp. 1150-1165. ISSN 0025-1909

[img]
Preview
Text
LambrechtA_Fee_or_Free_2016.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2MB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2383

Abstract

Many online content providers aim to compensate for a loss in advertising revenues by charging consumers for access to content. However, such a choice is not straightforward because subscription fees typically deter customers and a resulting decline in viewership further reduces advertising revenues. This research examines whether firms that offer both free and paid content can benefit from adjusting the amount of content offered for free. We find that firms should offer more free - and not paid - content in periods of high demand. We motivate theoretically that this policy which we term `counter-cyclical offering' may be optimal for firms when consumers are heterogeneous in their valuation of online content, this heterogeneity varies over time, and more so for low consumer types than for high types. Using unique data from an online content provider, we then provide empirical evidence that firms indeed engage in counter-cyclical offering and increase the share of free content in periods of high demand.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016 INFORMS
Subjects: P > Pricing
I > Internet
Subject Areas: Marketing
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2383
Date Deposited: 18 May 2016 13:50
Last Modified: 26 Apr 2017 00:01
URI: http://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/495

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Statistics

Altmetric