Discussion of “Implications of the integral approach and earnings management for alternative annual reporting periods”

Lawrence, A (2013) Discussion of “Implications of the integral approach and earnings management for alternative annual reporting periods”. Review of Accounting Studies, 18 (3). pp. 892-898. ISSN 1380-6653

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11142...

Abstract

The paper by Gunny, Jacob, and Jorgensen (Rev Account Stud, 2013) provides evidence on whether the earnings volatility induced by year-end adjusting entries results from the integral method of accounting or from purposeful earnings management. The authors find that the variance and negative skewness of annual fiscal-year earnings is greater than the corresponding attributes of alternative annual earnings ending in the first three quarters and interpret these findings as evidence consistent with earnings management rather than settling up annual earnings under the integral method of accounting. While it is difficult to assess the usefulness of their conclusion due to problematic assumptions inherent in the research design, Gunny et al. (2013) reinforce the importance of assessing earnings performance using rolling annual windows. Specifically, they find that the quality of earnings for the alternative annual earnings is greater than that of fiscal-year earnings, highlighting that financial statement users may benefit from using alternative annual earnings to assess current and future performance.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: A > Accounting valuations
Subject Areas: Accounting
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-013-9241-z
Date Deposited: 31 Aug 2017 15:46
Last Modified: 31 Aug 2017 15:46
URI: http://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/866

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Statistics

Altmetric