Complements or substitutes? A microfoundations perspective on the interplay between drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs

Zimmermann, A, Hill, S A, Birkinshaw, J and Jaeckel, M (2019) Complements or substitutes? A microfoundations perspective on the interplay between drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs. Long Range Planning. ISSN 0024-6301 (In Press)

Abstract

Research on the microfoundations of ambidexterity has identified a number of drivers that shape the ability of individuals to overcome exploration-exploitation tensions. However, little is known about how these drivers interact and whether they act as complements or substitutes. In a two-stage survey of small and medium-sized enterprises, we find that formal structural drivers and informal contextual drivers of ambidexterity do not demonstrate complementarity, as generally assumed, but rather act at cross-purposes with each other. Furthermore, we find that behaviorally complex executives (those with the ability to think and act ambidextrously) appear to render the effects of the other two drivers relatively unimportant, and are only ever associated with moderate levels of ambidexterity. These findings permit the development of important theoretical insights for ambidexterity research from a microfoundations perspective.

More Details

Item Type: Article
Subject Areas: Strategy and Entrepreneurship
Additional Information:

© 2019 Elsevier

Subjects: M > Management organisation structure
L > Leadership
Date Deposited: 14 Nov 2019 11:44
Last Modified: 11 Jan 2020 10:24
URI: https://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/1270
More

Export and Share


Download

Accepted Version - Text
  • Restricted to Repository staff only
  • Available under License

Statistics

Altmetrics
View details on Dimensions' website

Downloads from LBS Research Online

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item