Rational expectations and the paradox of policy-relevant natural experiments

Chemla, G and Hennessy, C (2020) Rational expectations and the paradox of policy-relevant natural experiments. Journal of Monetary Economics, 114. pp. 368-381. ISSN 0304-3932

Abstract

Policy experiments using large microeconomic datasets have recently gained ground in macroeconomics. Imposing rational expectations, we examine robustness of evidence derived from ideal natural experiments applied to atomistic agents in dynamic settings. Paradoxically, once experimental evidence is viewed as sufficiently clean to use, it then becomes contaminated by ex post endogeneity: Measured responses depend upon priors and the objective function into which evidence is fed. Moreover, agents’ policy beliefs become endogenously correlated with their causal parameters, severely clouding inference, e.g. sign reversals and non-invertibility may obtain. Treatment-control differences are contaminated for non-quadratic adjustment costs. Constructively, we illustrate how inference can be corrected accounting for feedback and highlight factors mitigating contamination.

More Details

[error in script]
Item Type: Article
Subject Areas: Finance
Additional Information:

© 2019 Elsevier

Date Deposited: 26 Jul 2019 10:59
Subjects: Experiments
Expectation
Last Modified: 17 Apr 2024 01:41
URI: https://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/1145
[error in script] More

Export and Share


Download

Full text not available from this repository.

Statistics

Altmetrics
View details on Dimensions' website

Downloads from LBS Research Online

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item