Moral choice when harming is unavoidable

Berman, J Z and Kupor, D (2020) Moral choice when harming is unavoidable. Psychological Science, 31 (10). pp. 1294-1301. ISSN 0956-7976 OPEN ACCESS

Abstract

Past research suggests that actors seek to minimize harm often at the cost of maximizing social welfare. However, this prior research has confounded a desire to minimize the negative impact caused by one’s actions (harm aversion) with a desire to avoid causing any harm whatsoever (harm avoidance). Across six studies (N = 2,152), we demonstrate that these two motives are distinct. Specifically, we find that when decision-makers can completely avoid committing a harmful act they strongly prefer to do so. However, harming often cannot be avoided, and decision-makers must choose between committing less harm for less benefit or committing more harm for more benefit. In these cases, harm aversion diminishes substantially, and decision-makers become increasingly willing to commit greater harm to obtain greater benefits. Thus, value-tradeoffs that decision-makers refuse to accept when it is possible to completely avoid committing harm can suddenly become desirable when some harm must be committed.

More Details

Item Type: Article
Subject Areas: Marketing
Additional Information:

© 2020 Association for Psychological Science. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications

Date Deposited: 02 Jun 2020 09:22
Date of first compliant deposit: 15 May 2020
Subjects: C > Choice
V > Value analysis
Last Modified: 04 Sep 2021 19:02
URI: https://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/1407
More

Export and Share


Download

Accepted Version - Text (Supporting Materials)
  • Available under License
Published Version - Text (Article)
  • Available under License

Statistics

Altmetrics
View details on Dimensions' website

Downloads from LBS Research Online

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item