Detrimental Collaborations in Creative Work: Evidence from Economics

Vakili, K, Teodoridis, F and Bikard, M (2022) Detrimental Collaborations in Creative Work: Evidence from Economics. Organization Science, 33 (5). pp. 1741-1755. ISSN 1047-7039 OPEN ACCESS


Prior research on collaboration and creativity often assumes that individuals choose to collaborate to improve the quality of their output. Given the growing role of collaboration and autonomous teams in creative work, the validity of this assumption has important implications for organizations. We argue that in the presence of a collaboration credit premium—when the sum of fractional credit allocated to each collaborator exceeds 100%— individuals may choose to work together even when the project output is of low quality or when its prospects are diminished by collaborating. We test our argument on a sample of economists in academia using the norm of alphabetical ordering of authors’ surnames on academic articles as an instrument for selection into collaboration. This norm means that economists whose family name begins with a letter from the beginning of the alphabet receive systematically more credit for collaborative work than economists whose family name begins with a letter from the end of the alphabet. We show that, in the presence of a credit premium, individuals may choose to collaborate even if this choice decreases output quality. Thus, collaboration can create a misalignment between the incentives of creative workers and the prospects of the project.

More Details

Item Type: Article
Subject Areas: Strategy and Entrepreneurship
Date Deposited: 26 Jul 2021 07:25
Date of first compliant deposit: 26 Jul 2021
Last Modified: 24 May 2024 01:39

Export and Share


Accepted Version - Text
Supplemental Material - Text


View details on Dimensions' website

Downloads from LBS Research Online

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item