Comment and Response to “Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching” by Mark DeFond, David H. Erkens, and Jieying Zhang

Lawrence, A, Minutti-Meza, M and Zhang, P (2017) Comment and Response to “Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching” by Mark DeFond, David H. Erkens, and Jieying Zhang. Management Science, 63 (11). pp. 3650-3653. ISSN 0025-1909

Abstract

This discussion presents the comments by the authors of Lawrence et al. [Lawrence A, Minutti-Meza M, Zhang P (2011) Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? Accounting Rev. 86(1):259–286] to the critique of their study in DeFond et al. [DeFond M, Erkens DH, Zhang Z (2017) Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Sci. 63(11):3628–3649] and response by the authors of the latter study.

More Details

Item Type: Article
Subject Areas: Accounting
Date Deposited: 19 Dec 2022 10:46
Last Modified: 09 Jan 2023 01:33
URI: https://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/2755
More

Export and Share


Download

Full text not available from this repository.

Statistics

Altmetrics
View details on Dimensions' website
Cited 0 times in

Downloads from LBS Research Online

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item