The Charity Beauty Premium: Satisfying Donors’ “Want” versus “Should” Desires

Cryder, C, Botti, S and Simonyan, Y (2017) The Charity Beauty Premium: Satisfying Donors’ “Want” versus “Should” Desires. Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (4). pp. 605-618. ISSN 0022-2437 OPEN ACCESS


Despite widespread conviction that neediness is the most important criterion for charitable allocations, we observe a “charity beauty premium” in which donors often favor beautiful, but less needy charity recipients. We propose that donors hold simultaneous, yet incongruent preferences of wanting to support beautiful recipients (who tend to be judged as less needy) yet believing they should support needy recipients instead. We additionally posit that preferences for beautiful recipients are most likely to emerge when decisions are intuitive whereas preferences for needy recipients are most likely to emerge when decisions are deliberative. We test these propositions in several ways. First, when a beautiful recipient is introduced to basic choice sets, it becomes the most popular option and increases donor satisfaction. Second, heightening deliberation steers choices away from beautiful recipients and toward needier ones. Third, donors explicitly state that they “want” to give to beautiful recipients but “should” give to less beautiful, needier ones. Taken together, these findings reconcile and extend previous and sometimes conflicting results about beauty and generosity.

More Details

Item Type: Article
Subject Areas: Marketing
Additional Information:

© 2017 American Marketing Association

Date Deposited: 01 Nov 2016 19:21
Date of first compliant deposit: 20 Oct 2016
Subjects: Decision-making
Last Modified: 23 Jul 2024 01:29

Export and Share


Accepted Version - Text
Accepted Version - Text (Appendix)


View details on Dimensions' website

Downloads from LBS Research Online

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item