Male immorality: an evolutionary account of sex differences in unethical negotiation behavior

Lee, M and Pitesa, M and Pillutla, M M and Thau, S (2017) Male immorality: an evolutionary account of sex differences in unethical negotiation behavior. Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), 60 (5). pp. 2014-2044. ISSN 0001-4273

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL:


Past research finds that men negotiate more unethically than women, although many studies report comparable rates of unethical negotiation behaviors. Based on evolutionary psychology, we predict conditions under which sex differences in unethical negotiation behavior are more versus less pronounced. We theorize that greater levels of unethical behavior among men occur as a consequence of greater male intrasexual competition for mates. This suggests that more male unethical negotiation behavior should primarily emerge in situations associated with intrasexual competition. Using a two-wave survey design, Study 1 found a positive relationship between mating motivation and unethical negotiation behavior for male, but not female employees. Study 2 was a controlled experiment, replicating this effect and showing that the gender difference was most pronounced when negotiating with same-sex, attractive opponents. Study 3 used a similar experimental design and found support for another implication of evolutionary theory—that mating motivation would prompt unethical behavior in both men and women when the behavior constitutes a less severe norm violation. We discuss contributions to the literature on unethical behavior at work, negotiations, and the role of attractiveness in organizations.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016 Academy of Management
Subjects: E > Ethics
N > Negotiation (Communication skills)
Subject Areas: Organisational Behaviour
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2015.0461
Date Deposited: 21 Nov 2016 13:09
Last Modified: 30 Oct 2017 15:08

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item