Zimmermann, A, Hill, S A, Birkinshaw, J and Jaeckel, M (2020) Complements or substitutes? A microfoundations perspective on the interplay between drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs. Long Range Planning, 53 (6). p. 101927. ISSN 0024-6301
Abstract
Research on the microfoundations of ambidexterity has identified a number of drivers that shape the ability of individuals to overcome exploration-exploitation tensions. However, little is known about how these drivers interact and whether they act as complements or substitutes. In a two-stage survey of small and medium-sized enterprises, we find that formal structural drivers and informal contextual drivers of ambidexterity do not demonstrate complementarity, as generally assumed, but rather act at cross-purposes with each other. Furthermore, we find that behaviorally complex executives (those with the ability to think and act ambidextrously) appear to render the effects of the other two drivers relatively unimportant, and are only ever associated with moderate levels of ambidexterity. These findings permit the development of important theoretical insights for ambidexterity research from a microfoundations perspective.
More Details
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subject Areas: | Strategy and Entrepreneurship |
Additional Information: |
© 2019 Elsevier |
Date Deposited: | 14 Nov 2019 11:44 |
Date of first compliant deposit: | 14 Nov 2019 |
Subjects: |
Management organisation structure Leadership |
Last Modified: | 09 Nov 2024 01:54 |
URI: | https://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/1270 |