Barasch, A, Berman, J Z and Small, D A (2016) When Payment Undermines the Pitch: On the Persuasiveness of Pure Motives in Fund-Raising. Psychological Science, 27 (10). pp. 1388-1397. ISSN 0956-7976
Abstract
Studies on crowding out document that incentives sometimes backfire—decreasing motivation in prosocial tasks. In the present research, we demonstrated an additional channel through which incentives can be harmful. Incentivized advocates for a cause are perceived as less sincere than nonincentivized advocates and are ultimately less effective in persuading other people to donate. Further, the negative effects of incentives hold only when the incentives imply a selfish motive; advocates who are offered a matching incentive (i.e., who are told that the donations they successfully solicit will be matched), which is not incompatible with altruism, perform just as well as those who are not incentivized. Thus, incentives may affect prosocial outcomes in ways not previously investigated: by crowding out individuals’ sincerity of expression and thus their ability to gain support for a cause.
More Details
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subject Areas: | Marketing |
Additional Information: |
© 2016 Association for Psychological Science |
Date Deposited: | 28 Nov 2016 12:33 |
Subjects: |
Fund raising Pay incentives Motivation |
Last Modified: | 21 Nov 2024 02:47 |
URI: | https://lbsresearch.london.edu/id/eprint/675 |